# Nature of Freewill

Upon deep meditation about the most holy mysteries of The Proof of Turing’s Halting Problem, I have come to the conclusion that $wtf(i)$ as defined in the one of the previous posts is the nature of freewill. And $h(a,i)$ is the nature of foresight.

Those two are in a perpetual pissing contest with each other. Always trying to one up the other.

A new $h(a,i)$ that can handle a wider set of inputs than its previous version is always being formulated in our minds as a response to experiences we have (i.e. using some kindaf Machine Learning equivalent). But after a new $h(a,i)$ is formulated an equivalent $wtf(i)$ is formulated automatically. This isn’t a big deal; all that has to be done is to contradict $h(a,i)$.

So freewill can be created in a mechanical fashion once foresight is created using a learning process.